{"id":486,"date":"2014-04-21T16:56:06","date_gmt":"2014-04-21T16:56:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/?p=486"},"modified":"2015-02-15T07:31:33","modified_gmt":"2015-02-15T07:31:33","slug":"teologie-sproste-slovo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/?p=486","title":{"rendered":"Teologie- sprost\u00e9 slovo ?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"images\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Posledn\u00ed roky sleduji, jak se st\u00e1le v\u00edce nap\u0159\u00ed\u010d c\u00edrkvemi rozm\u00e1haj\u00ed v\u011bty typu: \u201e to je na mne zbyte\u010dn\u00e1 teologie, j\u00e1 hlavn\u011b ty vztahy\u201c a v\u011bty tomu podobn\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Stra\u0161\u00e1k z teologie, jako by obch\u00e1zel mnoh\u00e9 c\u00edrkevn\u00ed spole\u010denstv\u00ed a mnoz\u00ed se jej boj\u00ed u\u017e vyslovit, jako by to bylo sprost\u00e9 slovo.<\/p>\n

P\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm c\u00edrkve s\u00a0ko\u0159eny v\u00a0USA, charizmatick\u00e1 hnut\u00ed, siln\u011b inklinuj\u00ed v\u00a0obch\u00e1zen\u00ed teologie s\u00a0od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00edm: \u201c\u010dtu to a vykl\u00e1d\u00e1m, jak to v\u00a0bibli le\u017e\u00ed a b\u011b\u017e\u00ed\u201c, nebo p\u0159inejhor\u0161\u00edm-vykl\u00e1d\u00e1m to, \u201cjak to c\u00edt\u00edm\u201c.<\/p>\n

Dovoluji si p\u0159ipomenout (\u010dasto zapom\u00ednan\u00e9), \u017ee teologie (z\u00a0\u0159eck\u00e9ho<\/a>\u00a0\u03b8\u03b5\u03bf\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03af\u03b1\u00a0theologia<\/em>\u00a0< \u03b8\u03ad\u03bf\u03c2\u00a0theos<\/em>\u00a0B\u016fh + \u03bb\u03cc\u03b3\u03bf\u03c2\u00a0logos<\/em>\u00a0slovo) je nauka o Bohu. Je zaj\u00edmav\u00e9, \u017ee ateistick\u00e9 slovn\u00edky to v\u011bd\u00ed, jen c\u00edrkve na to v posledn\u00ed dob\u011b n\u011bjak nesly\u0161\u00ed. Mnoh\u00e9 c\u00edrkve, na vln\u011b common sense, p\u0159istupuj\u00ed k\u00a0textu s\u00a0od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00edm, \u017ee sta\u010d\u00ed pouze \u010d\u00edst a selsk\u00fdm (zdrav\u00fdm) rozumem \u010dten\u00e9 aplikovat.<\/p>\n

Abych byl pochopen – nejde o to vytv\u00e1\u0159et spole\u010denstv\u00ed pouze intelektu\u00e1l\u016f (kam bych pak chodil), ale je smutn\u00e9, kdy\u017e v\u00edt\u011bz\u00ed prakti\u010dnost onoho, jak se to hod\u00ed, nad t\u00edm co cht\u011bl skrze pisatele \u0159\u00edct B\u016fh s\u00e1m.<\/p>\n

Paradoxn\u011b-je to pr\u00e1v\u011b teologie-kter\u00e1 centruje a u\u010d\u00ed pou\u017e\u00edvat zdrav\u00fd rozum.<\/p>\n

Nen\u00ed divu, \u017ee pak vznikaj\u00ed r\u016fzn\u00e9 hereze, sekty a odno\u017ee uvnit\u0159 c\u00edrkve s\u00a0d\u016frazem na n\u011bco co je t\u0159eba kulturn\u011b biblicky podm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9.<\/p>\n

P\u0159itom pokud je dobr\u00e1 teologie (nauka o Bohu), tak naopak prohlubuje setk\u00e1n\u00ed s\u00a0N\u00edm, samoz\u0159ejm\u011b o\u017eivuje dobr\u00e9 vztahy, v\u00a0kone\u010dn\u00e9 \u0159ad\u011b a dobr\u00e9 posloupnosti, tak\u00e9 uv\u00e1d\u00ed v\u00a0pohyb praxi v\u011b\u0159\u00edc\u00edho. Teologie – respektuje jazyk, dobu, poselstv\u00ed pisatele a dobr\u00fdm kl\u00ed\u010dem exegeze se pt\u00e1 i na podstatn\u00e9: Co, kdy, kde, jak, pro\u010d.<\/p>\n

Cht\u011bl bych zd\u016fraznit, \u017ee n\u00e9 v\u017edy to mus\u00ed b\u00fdt v\u00fdsada vzd\u011blan\u00fdch lid\u00ed. Laici maj\u00ed v\u00edce ne\u017e kdy jindy mo\u017enost srovn\u00e1n\u00ed textu ve v\u00edcero p\u0159ekladech, nahl\u00e9dnut\u00ed do biblick\u00fdch slovn\u00edk\u016f, konkordanc\u00ed atd.<\/p>\n

Tam kde se nepou\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 teologie, projevuj\u00ed se tyto znaky:<\/p>\n

– m\u00edsto \u017eiv\u00e9ho Bo\u017e\u00edho slova v\u00edt\u011bz\u00ed m\u00fdty<\/p>\n

– mozek se bere jako omyl stvo\u0159en\u00ed<\/p>\n

– m\u00edsto hled\u00e1n\u00ed a p\u0159ibli\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed se k\u00a0Pravd\u011b, v\u00edt\u011bz\u00ed pocit – \u201ej\u00e1 si mysl\u00edm, j\u00e1 to tak c\u00edt\u00edm\u201c<\/p>\n

– spole\u010denstv\u00ed nam\u00edsto Bo\u017e\u00edho zjeven\u00e9ho je zm\u00edt\u00e1no vlastn\u00edmi n\u00e1zory a n\u00e1sledn\u00fdm zklam\u00e1n\u00edm<\/p>\n

– je pozorov\u00e1no siln\u00e9 podhoub\u00ed k\u00a0rostouc\u00edmu fundamentalismu
\nNap\u0159. za \u0159adu let v\u00a0b\u00fdval\u00e9m prost\u0159ed\u00ed c\u00edrkve adventist\u016f jsem m\u011bl mo\u017enost mnohokr\u00e1t pozorovat, jak ne\u0161\u0165astnou \u00falohu maj\u00ed Ti, kte\u0159\u00ed maj\u00ed teologick\u00e9 vzd\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed a co je\u0161t\u011b h\u016f\u0159e na Bohosloveck\u00e9, nikoliv na adventn\u00ed fakult\u011b. I p\u0159es jejich znalost p\u016fvodn\u00edho jazyka textu, p\u0159es nastudov\u00e1n\u00ed si probl\u00e9mu pozad\u00ed text\u016f, je v\u017edy opravoval a cenzuroval kdejak\u00fd \u010dlen bez bli\u017e\u0161\u00edho nahl\u00e9dnut\u00ed do textu. Ke kritice mu sta\u010dilo pouze vn\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed common sense a samoz\u0159ejm\u011b srovn\u00e1n\u00ed k\u00e1zan\u00e9ho se spisy E.G.Whiteov\u00e9. Pokud se k\u00e1zaj\u00edc\u00ed \u201eneve\u0161el\u201c \u2013 byl kritizov\u00e1n, \u017ee to je (paradoxn\u011b) \u201esam\u00e1 teologie\u201c. T\u00edm je zcela nemo\u017en\u00e9 b\u00fdt c\u00edrkv\u00ed reformovatelnou a reformuj\u00edc\u00ed se.<\/p>\n

P\u0159itom pr\u00e1v\u011b teologie – setk\u00e1n\u00ed s\u00a0Bohem samotn\u00fdm, vystaven\u00ed se tomu, by m\u011blo b\u00fdt nosn\u00fdm motorem \u017eivota c\u00edrkve. Pokud tomu tak nen\u00ed, je c\u00edrkev pouze klubem p\u0159inejlep\u0161\u00edm dobr\u00fdch vyprav\u011b\u010d\u016f.<\/p>\n

Snad drobn\u00e1 nad\u011bje by mohla b\u00fdt, \u017ee zpoza kazatelny zazn\u00ed dobr\u00e1 teologie. \u017del i tam (nehled\u011b na laiky, kazatele, far\u00e1\u0159e) \u010dasto v\u00edt\u011bz\u00ed hv\u011bzdn\u00e9 hodinky \u0159e\u010dn\u00edk\u016f, pln\u00e9 alegorick\u00fdch vypr\u00e1v\u011bn\u00ed, m\u00edsto v\u00fdkladu samotn\u00e9ho.<\/p>\n

Nen\u00ed nic jednodu\u0161\u0161\u00edho, ne\u017e stav\u011bt k\u00e1z\u00e1n\u00ed, jak se traduje na p\u0159\u00edb\u011bhu laick\u00fdch kazatel\u016f hav\u00ed\u0159\u016f na Ostravsku – (znovu p\u0159ipom\u00edn\u00e1m – nen\u00ed to o vzd\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed) pl\u00e1cnout t\u00e9ma, \u017ee Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161 je k\u00e1men \u00faheln\u00fd a \u017ee to \u201euhl\u00ed\u201c vlastn\u011b h\u0159eje, \u017ee to d\u00e1 pr\u00e1ci ho nakopat\u2026.., \u017ee kdy\u017e se od uhl\u00ed vzd\u00e1l\u00edte je V\u00e1m zima\u2026.., a pak povypr\u00e1v\u011bt citov\u00fd p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh, \u017ee jsem se jednou od uhl\u00ed i sp\u00e1lil\u2026 alegorizovat to na P\u00e1na Boha a na z\u00e1v\u011br na to rychle pl\u00e1cnout n\u011bjak\u00fd text bible, abychom j\u00ed v\u016fbec otev\u0159eli.<\/p>\n

A tak nen\u00ed divu, \u017ee i v\u00a0protestantsk\u00e9m prost\u0159ed\u00ed jsou \u010dasto k\u00e1z\u00e1n\u00ed ur\u010ditou formou o\u010distce, kter\u00e9 si \u010dlenov\u00e9 mus\u00ed vytrp\u011bt, aby byli spaseni.<\/p>\n

Z\u00a0kazatelen nam\u00edsto Bo\u017e\u00edho zjeven\u00e9ho zazn\u00edvaj\u00ed \u010dasto moralistick\u00e9 \u00favahy, kde je poslucha\u010d ponejprv vystra\u0161en, jak\u00e1 \u017ee je doba, co d\u011bl\u00e1 \u0161patn\u011b a pak je mu nab\u00eddnuto instantn\u00ed \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed. Nic naplat, \u017ee \u010dasto zcela mimo text P\u00edsma. To u\u017e pak nen\u00ed exegeze, ale eisegeze, tedy vkl\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00edm vlastn\u00edho v\u00fdkladu do dan\u00e9ho textu.<\/p>\n

P\u0159\u00e1l bych v\u0161em spole\u010denstv\u00edm, tolik pot\u0159ebn\u00e9 setk\u00e1v\u00e1ni s\u00a0Bohem. \u010clen\u016fm, aby nebyli z\u00a0poza kazatelen drb\u00e1ni na m\u00edstech, kde je to nesvrb\u00ed, k\u00e1zaj\u00edc\u00edm, aby pokud mo\u017eno P\u00e1nu Bohu nep\u0159ek\u00e1\u017eeli. S\u00a0b\u00e1zn\u00ed a chv\u011bn\u00edm p\u0159istupovali k\u00a0textu na modlitb\u011b, s\u00a0kl\u00ed\u010dem, kter\u00fd neni\u010d\u00ed z\u00e1mek poklad\u016f tolik pot\u0159ebn\u00fdch pro dne\u0161n\u00ed dobu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Posledn\u00ed roky sleduji, jak se st\u00e1le v\u00edce nap\u0159\u00ed\u010d c\u00edrkvemi rozm\u00e1haj\u00ed v\u011bty typu: \u201e to je na mne zbyte\u010dn\u00e1 teologie, j\u00e1 hlavn\u011b ty vztahy\u201c a v\u011bty tomu podobn\u00e9. Stra\u0161\u00e1k z teologie, jako by obch\u00e1zel mnoh\u00e9 c\u00edrkevn\u00ed spole\u010denstv\u00ed a mnoz\u00ed se jej … Cel\u00fd p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvek →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[8],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/486"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=486"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/486\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":607,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/486\/revisions\/607"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=486"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}