{"id":1034,"date":"2016-01-14T17:57:57","date_gmt":"2016-01-14T17:57:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/?p=1034"},"modified":"2016-01-14T17:57:57","modified_gmt":"2016-01-14T17:57:57","slug":"proc-se-adventismus-boji-biblicke-kritiky-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/?p=1034","title":{"rendered":"Pro\u010d se adventismus boj\u00ed biblick\u00e9 kritiky 2."},"content":{"rendered":"

Historick\u00e1 kritika je ze sv\u00e9 podstaty v p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9m rozporu s fundamentalismem a dogmatismem \u00a0\u00a0a je zbran\u00ed proti oboj\u00edmu.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

Co v\u0161e by se provalilo, kdyby se pou\u017e\u00edvala biblick\u00e1 exegeze?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Uka\u017eme si to na jednom z\u00a0mnoha p\u0159\u00edklad\u016f.<\/p>\n

Z\u00e1klad adventismu a vn\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00a0praxi je dodnes polo\u017een na doslovn\u00e9m vn\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed P\u00edsma (1.)<\/sup> s\u00a0tot\u00e1ln\u00ed absenc\u00ed systematick\u00e9 teologie. Ti, kdo se zaj\u00edmaj\u00ed v\u00edce o historii adventistick\u00e9ho hnut\u00ed v\u00a0Americe, jist\u011b v\u011bd\u00ed, \u017ee rozhoduj\u00edc\u00ed byly emotivn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed prvky, d\u00e9lky stanov\u00fdch proslov\u016f, ne\u017e pokorn\u00e9 ohnut\u00ed zad, u\u010dit se nap\u0159. pochopen\u00ed, jak to \u017eidov\u0161t\u00ed auto\u0159i v\u00a0dan\u00e9 dob\u011b mysleli, atd. Svoji nemalou roli v\u00a0tom sehr\u00e1l i antisemitismus, kter\u00fd byl jedn\u00edm z\u00a0ovoc\u00ed tohoto doslovn\u00e9ho v\u00fdkladu.<\/p>\n

Dal\u0161\u00ed prvek, krom\u011b fundamentalistick\u00e9ho pojet\u00ed, byl tak\u00e9 ten, \u017ee se vylilo s\u00a0vani\u010dkou i d\u00edt\u011b t\u00edm, \u017ee se toto hnut\u00ed odm\u00edtlo u\u010dit z\u00a0historie d\u00e1vno objeven\u00fdch slep\u00fdch uli\u010dek v\u00a0c\u00edrkvi katolick\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Samotn\u00e1 garantka tohoto n\u00e1zoru E.G. Whiteov\u00e1 tuto doslovnou inspiraci = tud\u00ed\u017e i doslovn\u00fd v\u00fdklad stvrzovala ve sv\u00fdch vid\u011bn\u00edch (\u00fadajn\u011b od Hospodina).<\/p>\n

\u201eTak, jako pro Izrael, plat\u00ed i dnes lidu Bo\u017e\u00edmu slova, kter\u00e1 vnuknut\u00edm Ducha svat\u00e9ho\u00a0<\/em>napsal Moj\u017e\u00ed\u0161.\u201c<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>E.G.Whiteov\u00e1-Sv\u011bdectv\u00ed pro c\u00edrkev sv.6.<\/p>\n

Nikoho z\u00a0jejich sou\u010dasn\u00edk\u016f, ale tak i po dnes, netrkla jednoduch\u00e1 ot\u00e1zka (nebo nesm\u011bla trknout) – Jak by asi tak Moj\u017e\u00ed\u0161, kter\u00fd napsal \u00fadajn\u011b dle vid\u011bn\u00ed v\u0161ech 5 knih Tory mohl popisovat svoji smrt atd.<\/p>\n

Kdo si v\u00a0dob\u011b autorky dovolil trochu p\u0159em\u00fd\u0161let, s\u00a0t\u00edm si to (op\u011bt p\u0159es vid\u011bn\u00ed) vy\u0159\u00eddila takto:<\/p>\n

V modlitebn\u011b (v Battle Creeku) i na vysok\u00e9 \u0161kole se vyu\u010duje p\u0159edm\u011bt inspirace a smrteln\u00ed lid\u00e9 si p\u0159ivlast\u0148uj\u00ed pr\u00e1vo \u0159\u00edkat, \u017ee n\u011bkter\u00e9 v\u011bci v P\u00edsmech byly inspirov\u00e1ny a n\u011bkter\u00e9 ne.<\/strong> Bylo mi uk\u00e1z\u00e1no, \u017ee Hospodin nevnukl \u010dl\u00e1nky o inspiraci, uve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00e9 v\u00a0Review<\/em>, ani neschv\u00e1lil, aby se doporu\u010dovaly na\u0161\u00ed ml\u00e1de\u017ei na vysok\u00e9 \u0161kole. Kdy\u017e se lid\u00e9 odva\u017euj\u00ed kritizovat Bo\u017e\u00ed Slovo, dost\u00e1vaj\u00ed se na posv\u00e1tnou, svatou p\u016fdu, a rad\u011bji by m\u011bli s b\u00e1zn\u00ed a t\u0159esen\u00edm uznat svoji moudrost za po\u0161etilost. B\u016fh nepov\u011b\u0159il nikoho t\u00edm, aby pron\u00e1\u0161el soud nad Jeho Slovem, aby vyb\u00edral n\u011bkter\u00e9 v\u011bci jako inspirovan\u00e9 a zavrhoval ostatn\u00ed jako neinspirovan\u00e9. Se sv\u011bdectv\u00edm se zach\u00e1z\u00ed stejn\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem<\/u><\/strong><\/em>.<\/u><\/strong> \u00a0<\/strong>Letter 22, 1889.<\/p>\n

\u010cten\u00e1\u0159 si jist\u011b v\u0161imne, jak bylo d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 dodnes udr\u017eet doslovnost inspirace autor\u016f bible, proto\u017ee tak si autorka a posl\u00e9ze i cel\u00fd adventismus mohl vybudovat silnou pozici pro doslovnost sv\u011bdectv\u00ed autorky. Prost\u011b i k\u00a0jej\u00edm v\u00fdrok\u016fm se mus\u00ed p\u0159istupovat jako k\u00a0neomyln\u00fdm rad\u00e1m p\u0159\u00edmo od Boha, kter\u00e9 nesm\u011bj\u00ed b\u00fdt postoupeny kritick\u00e9mu zhodnocen\u00ed, kter\u00e9 by uk\u00e1zalo, \u017ee to nap\u0159. byl omyl, nebo osobn\u00ed n\u00e1zor autorky.<\/p>\n

\"OLYMPUS<\/a><\/p>\n

P\u0159em\u00fd\u0161liv\u00e1 v\u00edra<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

Cel\u00e1 \u0159ada jev\u016f v T\u00f3\u0159e ukazuje, \u017ee text nem\u00e1 jednoho jedin\u00e9ho autora, ani nebyl naps\u00e1n v jedn\u00e9 dob\u011b. Mezi tyto jevy pat\u0159\u00ed:<\/p>\n

– v\u00fdskyt stejn\u00e9ho textu na v\u00edce m\u00edstech, opakov\u00e1n\u00ed
\n– v\u00fdskyt proti\u0159e\u010d\u00edc\u00edch si text\u016f (nap\u0159. z\u00e1kon\u016f)
\n– vnit\u0159n\u00ed rozpory v textu (ukazuj\u00ed na skl\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed text\u016f z r\u016fzn\u00fdch zdroj\u016f, ani\u017e by tyto p\u0159edlohy byly slad\u011bny v jeden kompaktn\u00ed celek). Viz. nap\u0159\u00edklad\u00a0David a Goli\u00e1\u0161, rozd\u00edly v tradic\u00edch<\/a>\u00a0\u010di p\u0159ed\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed Z\u00e1kona – spleten\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edb\u011bhy<\/a>.<\/u><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

Moj\u017e\u00ed\u0161 nen\u00ed autor cel\u00e9 Gn. Podle toho, jak\u00e1 jm\u00e9na se pou\u017e\u00edvaj\u00ed pro stejn\u00e9 osoby, m\u00edsta, ud\u00e1losti, v\u00a0knih\u00e1ch existuj\u00ed dublety \u2013 n\u011bco je naps\u00e1no dvakr\u00e1t.<\/p>\n

Styl v\u00a0Gn. se tak\u00e9 m\u011bn\u00ed \u2013 nen\u00ed jednotn\u00e1 teologie \u2013 prol\u00edn\u00e1 se v\u00edce teologick\u00fdch n\u00e1zor\u016f. Znalci biblick\u00e9ho textu se shoduj\u00ed na tom, \u017ee autor\u016f bylo v\u00edce<\/strong>, \u017ee l\u00e1tka je hodn\u011b star\u00e1<\/strong>, a n\u011bkter\u00e9 texty se tradovaly \u00fastn\u011b a a\u017e velmi pozd\u011bji byly \u201cd\u00e1ny na pap\u00edr\u201c.<\/strong><\/p>\n

V\u00a0\u00favodu stoj\u00ed zpr\u00e1va o stvo\u0159en\u00ed sv\u011bta. Text neodpov\u00edd\u00e1 na to, jak byl stvo\u0159en sv\u011bt, ale pro\u010d<\/strong>.(3.)<\/sup><\/p>\n

Text o stvo\u0159en\u00ed vznikl n\u011bkdy v\u00a0dob\u011b Babylonsk\u00e9ho exilu<\/strong> a\u017e v 5. st. p\u0159ed Kr.<\/strong> (n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed \u0159\u00edkaj\u00ed 4. st. p\u0159ed Kr.). Stoj\u00ed sice \u00fapln\u011b prvn\u00ed v\u00a0Bibli, ale je mlad\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e druh\u00e1 zpr\u00e1va o stvo\u0159en\u00ed sv\u011bta.<\/p>\n

Autorem<\/strong> byli pravd\u011bpodobn\u011b kn\u011b\u017e\u00ed ur\u010dit\u00e9 teologick\u00e9 \u0161koly<\/strong>. Auto\u0159i museli velmi dob\u0159e zn\u00e1t babylonsk\u00e9 p\u0159edstavy o stvo\u0159en\u00ed sv\u011bta, oslavovali stvo\u0159itele Boha Malmuka. I proto se v\u00a0bibli objevuj\u00ed kritizovan\u00e1 a mnohem star\u0161\u00ed vypr\u00e1v\u011bn\u00ed z\u00a0babylonsk\u00fdch m\u00fdt\u016f – pouze je jim d\u00e1na jin\u00e1 podstata. Do chaosu a rozmar\u016f boh\u016f vstupuje Jeden, bezejmenn\u00fd, kter\u00fd m\u00e1 z\u00e1jem o \u010dlov\u011bka a d\u00e1v\u00e1 \u017eivotu smysl.<\/strong><\/p>\n

B\u016fh m\u00e1 o \u010dlov\u011bka takov\u00fd z\u00e1jem, \u017ee se klidn\u011b pon\u00ed\u017e\u00ed do jeho pov\u011br a m\u00fdt\u016f, jen aby mu byl bl\u00ed\u017e v\u00a0dan\u00e9 dob\u011b.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Biblick\u00fd text = teologie = biblick\u00e1 kritika chce p\u0159ibl\u00ed\u017eit dobov\u00e9 sd\u011blen\u00ed, \u017ee ne v\u017edy byl chaos, jak to popisuj\u00ed star\u00e9 mytologie, ale to, co m\u011blo sv\u016fj po\u010d\u00e1tek, bude m\u00edt i konec. A to konec k\u00a0nov\u00e9mu. V tom je nad\u011bje, v tom je evangelium.<\/p>\n

No \u0159ekn\u011bte, \u010dten\u00e1\u0159i. Ub\u00edr\u00e1 V\u00e1m to na v\u00ed\u0159e ?<\/p>\n

——————————————————————————————————————–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

(1.) Nap\u0159\u00edklad Miller odm\u00edt\u00e1 jak\u00fdkoliv jin\u00fd ne\u017e doslovn\u00fd v\u00fdklad Bible: \u201ePorovn\u00e1n\u00edm P\u00edsma s histori\u00ed jsem objevil, \u017ee v\u0161echna proroctv\u00ed, kter\u00e1 byla napln\u011bna, se naplnila doslovn\u011b\u2026..Kdy\u017e jsou takto vysv\u011btleny, mus\u00ed byt ch\u00e1p\u00e1ny doslovn\u011b v souladu s takov\u00fdmto v\u00fdkladem.\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

(Citov\u00e1no z WHITE, J. Sketches of the Christian Life and Public Labors of William Miller. 1. vyd.Battle Creek : Steam Press. 1875, s. 46).<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

(2.) Odkaz se t\u00fdk\u00e1 \u0159ady \u010dl\u00e1nk\u016f, jejich\u017e autor obhajoval n\u00e1zor o \u201erozd\u00edlech ve stupn\u00edch“ inspirace.<\/p>\n

(3.) \u00a0\u201cB\u016fh zjevil v P\u00edsmu spolehlivou a historickou zpr\u00e1vu<\/strong> o sv\u00e9 stvo\u0159itelsk\u00e9 \u010dinnosti. Stvo\u0159il vesm\u00edr a v ned\u00e1vn\u00e9m \u0161estidenn\u00edm stvo\u0159en\u00ed u\u010dinil Hospodin nebe, zemi, mo\u0159e i v\u0161echno, co je v nich, a odpo\u010dinul sedm\u00e9ho dne. Tak ustanovil sobotu jako trval\u00fd pam\u00e1tn\u00edk sv\u00e9ho d\u00edla vykonan\u00e9ho a dokon\u010den\u00e9ho v pr\u016fb\u011bhu \u0161esti doslovn\u00fdch dn\u016f<\/strong>, kter\u00e9 spole\u010dn\u011b se sobotou p\u0159edstavovaly stejnou jednotku \u010dasu, jak\u00e1 je dnes naz\u00fdv\u00e1na t\u00fddnem.\u201c\u00a0 Gener\u00e1ln\u00ed konference CASD 2015<\/p>\n

Biblick\u00e1 hebrej\u0161tina nem\u00e1 v\u00fdznamov\u00fd ekvivalent pro \u0159eck\u00fd chronos<\/em>, tj.\u010das plynouc\u00ed trvale a neomezen\u011b. Podobn\u011b jako indick\u00fd \u0160iva. V tom se biblick\u00fd pohled zaj\u00edmav\u011b shoduje s\u00a0novodobou fyzikou, kter\u00e1 uzn\u00e1v\u00e1 \u010das jen tam, kde je pohyb, a t\u00edm problematizuje samostatnou nez\u00e1vislou kategorii \u010dasu.<\/p>\n

Jan Heller \u2013 Obt\u00ed\u017en\u00e9 odd\u00edly knih Moj\u017e\u00ed\u0161ov\u00fdch<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Historick\u00e1 kritika je ze sv\u00e9 podstaty v p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9m rozporu s fundamentalismem a dogmatismem \u00a0\u00a0a je zbran\u00ed proti oboj\u00edmu.   Co v\u0161e by se provalilo, kdyby se pou\u017e\u00edvala biblick\u00e1 exegeze? Uka\u017eme si to na jednom z\u00a0mnoha p\u0159\u00edklad\u016f. Z\u00e1klad adventismu a vn\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed … Cel\u00fd p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvek →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[8],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1034"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1034"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1034\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1037,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1034\/revisions\/1037"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestaviry.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}